Methodology

Methodology

A report that reaches a conclusion without stating its basis asks to be trusted rather than checked. Every Haus Research report follows the same three stages, states what it examined, and never presents an estimate as a measurement.

Public-source review

Research begins with sources any reader can reach: the subject’s own website and documentation, public filings and registrations, product and pricing pages, press coverage, and third-party reference material. Sources are recorded as they are read. A claim that cannot be traced back to one does not enter the report, however plausible it is.

Entity analysis

The subject is treated as an entity with a definable set of attributes: what it does, who it serves, where it operates, what it publishes, and how it is described by parties other than itself. This stage establishes where the sources agree and where they do not. Gaps and contradictions are recorded as findings, not smoothed over by inference — what an organisation fails to establish about itself is usually the more informative result.

Structured evaluation

Findings are assessed against a fixed set of criteria applied identically across reports, so that two reports written a year apart remain comparable. Evaluation covers the clarity of the subject’s public description, the completeness and internal consistency of its published information, and how far that information can be verified by someone working from outside.

Limits

A report describes the record as it stood on the date of publication and is not revised as circumstances change. Haus Research accepts no payment from the subjects of its reports, does not treat private conversation as a substitute for public evidence, and publishes no forecasts, ratings, or investment advice. Where the public record does not support a conclusion, the report says so and stops.

Questions about method or about a specific report: research@hausresearch.com.